<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Wikipedia Content to Combat Duplicate Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.whatclinic.com/2009/09/using-wikipeida-content-to-combat-duplicate-content.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2009/09/using-wikipeida-content-to-combat-duplicate-content.html</link>
	<description>Sharing Tech, Marketing &#38; Health 2.0 information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:37:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConversionR &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IE Online Marketing Blogs: The Big List!</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2009/09/using-wikipeida-content-to-combat-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>ConversionR &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IE Online Marketing Blogs: The Big List!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=596#comment-747</guid>
		<description>[...] engine blog in an online marketing list, but it&#8217;s one of the best places to read about SEO, Duplicate Content or revenue [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] engine blog in an online marketing list, but it&#8217;s one of the best places to read about SEO, Duplicate Content or revenue [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caelen</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2009/09/using-wikipeida-content-to-combat-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>Caelen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=596#comment-695</guid>
		<description>We deleted the wikipedia content and after a week all the pages from the experiment recovered by 1-2 positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We deleted the wikipedia content and after a week all the pages from the experiment recovered by 1-2 positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caelen King</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2009/09/using-wikipeida-content-to-combat-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Caelen King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=596#comment-678</guid>
		<description>Hi John

Yep, we did that. To be honest we didn&#039;t really find the results to this experiment to be a surprise, however it was interesting to formalize it. In that it reduced the position in the SERPs even though the inclusion of the material increased the user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John</p>
<p>Yep, we did that. To be honest we didn&#8217;t really find the results to this experiment to be a surprise, however it was interesting to formalize it. In that it reduced the position in the SERPs even though the inclusion of the material increased the user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2009/09/using-wikipeida-content-to-combat-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>John O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=596#comment-677</guid>
		<description>Bit of an old one, but on the Syndicated content issue Google recommend syndicated articles linking back to the source. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niINTKXT-zs

I don&#039;t think their view on this has moved on too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit of an old one, but on the Syndicated content issue Google recommend syndicated articles linking back to the source.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niINTKXT-zs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niINTKXT-zs</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think their view on this has moved on too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

