The Trouble With Google AdWords

Google AdWords are great. In fact we bootstrapped RevaHealth.com for the first year using AdWords. We love the way even the smallest company can compete with the largest using AdWords.  It’s also great because everything is measurable. You can look at every last cent of expenditure and ensure that you are getting value.

So what is the problem?

The problem is that Adwords is a competition between advertisers for clicks. Each individual advertiser is looking for the maximum number of clicks for the minimum cost. Essentially the whole system of AdWords is one massive game that obeys the rules of game theory.  And unfortunately a game does not guarantee a good outcome for its players – as Yale Professor Ben Polak states ‘rational choices can lead to outcomes that suck’.

To illustrate this imagine you are one of 40 retailers selling mp3 players on line. To make things simple let’s pretend that every one of the retailers makes €10 gross profit from a sales and each retailer converts 10% of visitors to a sale.  Over time what will the price of a click approach?

The answer is that the price of a click will approach one euro which equals the gross profit of the sale. The reason for this is that if the current price of a click is €0.98 there will still be someone who isn’t getting any clicks that is willing to pay €0.99 for a click in order to earn €0.01 because even a single cent is better than no cents.

This is obviously an outcome that ‘sucks’ for the players of the game as 99% of the gross profit from their sale goes to Google.  A much better outcome for the player would be if they all colluded and agreed to evenly distribute the clicks between them and pay Google €0.01 per click.

So in an evenly distributed competitive market the cost of advertising will approach the gross profit margin.

For small businesses and start-ups it’s even worse

The cost of AdWords will only approach the gross profit margin if all of the participants are playing with the same cards and are playing logically. This is obviously not the case. Different companies have different profit margins, different advertising copy, different conversion rates, and different Google quality scores and advertise under different keywords.

All of this combines to make the game very difficult to play and impossible to optimise.  The problem for small businesses & start-ups is that they frequently don’t have the business metrics in place to be to effectively tell what the price of a click is worth.

In the case of start-ups the product and business landscape is changing so rapidly it invalidates historic data. In the case of small non-IT companies they typically need to spend many times their initial AdWords budget simply to get their initial set of metrics.

Google’s simple and friendly interface exacerbates this in many ways. It is so easy to control and change your advertising variables that frequently companies don’t give a campaign enough time to draw any accurate conclusion. This leads to consistent and continual tweaking without real lessons being learned.

The danger for these businesses is that when they look at using Google AdWords that they take the wrong approach. Rather than asking ‘how much is a click worth to me?’, they ask ‘How much does a click cost’. The attraction of this approach is that it is much easier – you simply raise the cost per click until you are getting the number of clicks that you want.

This approach is terrible and in today’s competitive market place is almost certainly going to lose you money.

The reason for this is two-fold. Firstly, the word is full of suckers and AdWords is no exception. Take a look at your AdWords competition and ‘if you can’t see the sucker in the room …’

Every minute of the day some sucker signs up to Google Adwords with a €10K budget and bids up to first position without so much of a thought (frequently these are agents working on behalf of clients and on client instructions). They burn through their budget and don’t get a return and disappear, however no sooner than they’re gone they are replaced by another sucker. After all ‘there’s a sucker born every minute’.

Secondly, your competition is playing with a different deck to you. Maybe their conversion rate is double yours, maybe their gross profit is higher or maybe they’re a large company with plenty of capital that are deliberately over spending in order to starve you of traffic.

The point is that when you are competing against suckers and sensible players who are playing with different decks then you are mad to be judging what you should pay on the basis of what they are paying.

In Summary

Google AdWords is now a mature, competitive marketplace for advertising. It is no longer the “new medium” it was four years ago where advertising was so cheap pretty much anyone could make money from it. Now to make money from AdWords you need to be a savvy marketeer in complete control of your metrics.  If you are not then you are either going to be underpaying or overpaying for your click. If you are chasing the market the chances are that you are overpaying and losing money.

The corollary to this is also true. If you know your metrics and are willing to put the time and management attention into Google AdWords then it can be a tremendously effective and controllable way of getting new business.

How have you gotten on with AdWords in your company?

Tagged with:  

SaaS Is Not Your Friend

I meet with a lot of start-ups that are determined on disrupting industries with Software as a Service (SaaS) solutions.  The business plans I see increasingly focus on niche markets, everything from food production through to legal and architectural, and not on businesses that already depend on the internet to survive.

To these entrepreneurs SaaS seems to be the obvious solution to entering and disrupting the market and in many ways I agree. However, these same entrepreneurs are generally so caught up over the advantages of SaaS that they fail to see that in their chosen target market dependence on the internet is a competitive disadvantage rather than an advantage.

This isn’t a problem in itself, but it is vital that the entrepreneurs recognise it and aren’t blinded to the problems their customers are going to face. These problems are rooted in three areas: infrastructure, culture and commitment.

The benefits of SaaS are well documented and include:

  1. No installation
  2. Low levels of investment required by the customer
  3. Universal availability
  4. Improved support because everyone is on the same version of the software
  5. No distribution costs
  6. Utility based pricing
  7. Recurring revenue for the vendor

These all seem like compelling business advantages, making SaaS solutions intrinsically sellable in any market. However, the very premise of SaaS is that it is built on the infrastructure of the internet, and if the internet isn’t reliably and effectively in place in a business already then a SaaS sale has some severe obstacles to overcome.

Infrastructure

SaaS depends on the internet. That’s why the first successful SaaS companies have focused on providing business solutions to businesses that already depend on having good internet connectivity.

Problems arise when entrepreneurs make the mistaken assumption that just because universal, fast and reliable internet connectivity is a priority for their own business that it is automatically a business priority of companies in their target niche.

The issue here is that when your SaaS solution fails for your customer it doesn’t matter why it failed – it’s your fault. If it is because their ISP got flooded and “the internet went down” then it is still your fault, just like if you pay a courier to deliver a parcel and they don’t because a bridge fell down, it’s still the courier’s fault.

The problem boils down to this – if you are selling to a business that doesn’t already have internet connectivity as a business priority then when something goes wrong (and it will) they won’t know how to get back online. Their regular staff members probably don’t know who provides their internet service, so they call you. You don’t know either so you call the business owner. They call their provider who says it isn’t their issue, and before you know it days pass before they are back online.

Unless you are building an application for the minority business where internet connectivity is already a business priority then you are going to be swimming upstream with your SaaS solution.

Culture

If you go to your mechanic to get your car fixed and they are busy and you have to wait a few hours, or even a day or two, then it’s usually no big deal. The chances are that the mechanic will retain you as a customer, but it’s a different story when something really has to be done and you are forced to find an alternative solution.

Say for instance you are leaving on a family driving holiday tomorrow and your normal mechanic can’t see you, forcing you to find an alternative solution. The chances are that you will never revert back to the original mechanic but stick with the new reliable solution.

The same thing applies when an employee uses your system and it fails for any reason. If what the employee is doing is critical and time sensitive, such as taking a payment, then the employee is going to revert back to the old solution. From this point on it is going to be very difficult to convince that employee to ever use your “unreliable” solution again.

Large companies realize this and put huge emphasis on change management. This is because when a large company implements a solution it typically represents a massive business commitment. Smaller companies often haven’t learned this yet but it applies just as much.

Commitment

The pricing model for SaaS solutions is typically a monthly subscription, which is great because it gives the customer a really low entry cost and provides the vendor with nice recurring revenue.  In a lot of ways this seems like the perfect business model for software. However it has a serious problem – commitment or “buy in”.

When a business purchases a traditional software solution there are a lot of costs. The license may cost a couple of thousand, the server will be another grand and then there is the training which forms the backbone of a lot of software companies’ revenues.  All in all it represents a serious commitment by the company.

What this means is that when the customer has a problem with the traditional software model then they are strongly incentivised to protect the investment the company has already made, and to persevere and overcome the issue. In the SaaS pricing model the upfront commitment is reduced and therefore the inclination is to give up and revert to the next best solution, even if it is pen and paper!

What to do

SaaS has so many compelling advantages that the last thing I would advocate is to abandon the approach. What needs to be done is to recognise the business challenges that a SaaS solution presents to a business and be prepared to face those challenges head on.

  • Have a documented change management process that includes provisions for internet failure
  • Explore the use of thin clients such as Google Gears or Adobe Air
  • Make sure that you don’t just sign up customers, make sure they are committed customers.
  • Provide for staff training (this should be a profit centre)
Tagged with:  

How To Use Our Patient Enquiry Management Tool

When you login to Revahealth.com, the page you land on is your Patient Enquiries page. On this page, you can view and manage enquiries from people who are interested in treatment at your clinic. You can also reach this page after you are logged in, by clicking on the “Patient Enquiries” tab in your control panel.

1. Overview of a patient enquiry

Let’s take a look at the layout of a patient enquiry.

In the summary view, you can see the following information:

  • The person’s name, phone number and email address.
  • A description of the treatment they require
  • Outstanding tasks for this enquiry, and
  • The Actions menu, which is explained below.

If you click on a person’s name, a detailed view of the enquiry opens up.

In the detailed view of the enquiry, you can see the following additional information

  • In ‘Contact Details’, you can see the person’s location
  • In ‘History’ you can see the keywords and path this person used to find you on Revahealth.com
  • In ‘Other Information’ you can see the status of the enquiry, the date the enquiry was made, the source of the enquiry, the cost of the enquiry, any feedback from the person enquiring such as whether they have been contacted yet or not, and if a review was posted by the person enquiring.

2. The Actions Menu

The Actions menu is your key tool for managing patient enquiries. The actions on this menu can be broken into two parts:

2.1 Current Status: The first three actions enable you to tag the person’s current status:

  • Booked – you tag a person as booked if they have booked an appointment with you.
  • Archive – you tag a person as archived if you have no further plans to follow up with this person
  • Active – people who are not booked or archived are tagged as active. If you have previously tagged someone as booked or archived and something changes such as they cancel their booking or the express a renewed interest in booking an appointment, you can change their status back to active.

2.2 Add and Request Information: The next five actions enable you to add or request information relevant to the booking.

  • Add a note: opens a box where you can add a note of your conversation.
  • View Full details: this does the same thing as clicking on the person’s name: it opens up the detailed view of the enquiry.
  • Edit Contact details: opens up the persons contact details. If you get another number to call them on or you want to add their address etc.
  • Open task: opens up a box where you can set yourself a task and add a date on which to contact this person or take an action. Your tasks appear in the To Do section in the grey area on the right hand side of your screen.
  • Request review: opens up an email which you can edit and send to past patient in order to get them to review you on Revahealth.com. Increasing the number of reviews for your clinic is a great way to help new people who are looking for the treatment s you provide find out more about your clinic.

3. Navigating Your Patient Enquiries

This list is ordered with the most recent enquiries at the top.

You may also choose to filter the list based on the enquiry status. You can choose to show your patient enquiries as “All”, “Active and New”, “Active”, “Booked”, “Archived”, and “All with Tasks”

  • Active and new: enquiries that are “Active and new” are displayed as the default, when you enter the patient enquiries section of your control panel.
  • New: These are enquiries that you have not read yet.
  • Active: These are enquiries which you have read, and which are not been yet booked or archived.
  • Booked: These are from people who have booked an appointment with your clinic. For enquiries to appear as booked, you must mark them as booked using the actions menu, which we will come to in a minute.
  • Archived: You archive an enquiry when you have no further plans to follow up with this person.
  • “All Enquiries”:  are shown all enquiries, in the order in which they have been created – the most recently created at the top.
  • “All with tasks:”

You can search by the person’s name or email address.

4. Adding enquiries from other sources

On the top right of the page you have the following options: add an enquiry, export, import, integrate.

  • Add an enquiry: Helps you keep track of all of your enquiries from one place. You add the source of the enquiries: did it come from your website etc, the date the enquiry was made, the contact details of the enquirer and the details of the enquiry.
  • Export: you can export the files in csv format. Choose the dates. Choose the status of enquiries.
  • Import: You can also import enquiries. This is still in early stage of development. If you would like to import enquiries please contact support@revahealth.com and we can go through this with you.
  • Integrate: You can also integrate an enquiry form on your website. Simply copy the following text and paste it into the appropriate page on your website. Alternatively contact your webmaster and he can help you to implement this form. This will send all your enquiries into your revahealth.com enquiry management system and also send you an email with the enquiry.
 

Webmaster Tools To The Rescue

I logged into my Google Webmaster tools account yesterday to find a strange message waiting for me.

A message from Google Webmaster Tools

Initially I didn’t think too much of it. This year our site has gone from having around 30,000 pages listed in Google’s index to having over 1.5 million. That’s a lot of URLs in anyone’s language. However, Google did helpfully supply a list of URLs that it said were problematic, so I decided to take a closer look.

It turned out on closer inspection that somehow we’d managed to open a back door to the pages on the website with no search results on them, i.e. we were internally linking to potentially millions of pages that had little or no content.

I’ll hand you over to Dave to explain what happened and why:

Users can navigate RevaHealth.com in a variety of ways, including searching using text input and by narrowing their current search criteria by location, type of clinic, treatment, and so on.

The narrowing mechanism also allows Google to traverse the site. Each entry in our dropdown lists is a link to another search page.

For example on the Dublin Dentists page there are links to locations within Dublin, (/dentists/Ireland/county-dublin/portmarnock) and links to search pages for specific treatments (dentists/Ireland/county-dublin/fillings). Google crawls the website by following these links.

We don’t want Google (or users) to be able to select options or follow links from these dropdowns that will bring them to search pages with no results. Therefore, when the current search page is created, we determine which options would be valid. If we do not have any dentists in Portmarnock on the site, then we simply don’t include the link to /dentists/Ireland/county-dublin/portmarnock in the dropdown. Similarly, if there are no dentists in Dublin that perform fillings we don’t include links to that set of results either. This makes the search page more complex to build, but it’s vital. Otherwise we would invite google to index millions of empty pages (and make our narrowing far less useful).

After seeing Google’s message in the Webmaster Tools we realised that something we had done had allowed many empty search pages to be reached by GoogleBot – disaster! The search pages themselves seemed fine. However, we had recently added our narrowing functionality on to our clinics’ brochure pages also. While this should have behaved identically to the search pages, we found that it wasn’t. The navigation on brochures actually allowed some empty pages to be traversed.

Thankfully, we had known from the start that empty pages might be reached as clinics came and went from the database, and had added a “noindex” tag to the empty pages should they be found. So, even though Google was reaching them, they were not being added to the index. Unfortunatley, from there, we also linked to a map page which shows the clinics on a map. This wasn’t tagged with a “noindex”, so when Google would reach an empty search results page it would be ignored, but then the empty map page would be indexed. As googlebot did its busy work thousands and thousands were added until Google decided to warn us about them.

Fortunately, the bug, while hard to find, was very easy to fix. So out hearty thanks to Google, the newest member of our test team.

Luckily we identified this back door quite quickly and have blocked it off, but if we hadn’t known about this Google would probably have stopped indexing large portions of our site, which would have had a very serious effect on our traffic.

So, our rather obvious tip of the day is if you haven’t already signed up for Google’s Webmaster Tools, do it today here:

http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/

Our other rather obvious tip is that Google is famous  when Google takes the time to tell you there’s a problem, there probably is a problem! Have you had any messages from Google lately, and have they helped you identify any potential problems?

Tagged with:  

Splitting Your Sitemap For Geo-Targeted SEO

One of the real challenges facing us at RevaHealth.com is how best to SEO the different sections of our website that should be targeted at specific countries, but don’t exist neatly in one subdirectory or sub-domain, or have localised (i.e. translated) content.

Two weeks ago we posted the results of our ccTLD SEO experiment, where we described our attempts to improve the rankings of some of our UK and Ireland targeted pages by redirecting them from our .com site to our .co.uk and .ie sites respectively.

Following on from a suggestion by Leo Fogarty and an article by Lisa Myers we have now implemented multiple sitemaps to geo-target sections of our website to their intended audiences.

First we created /IE and /UK subfolders on the .com site. Then we made sitemaps of the sections of the site to be geo-targeted to Irish and British audiences respectively and put these into these folders. Finally we submitted these sitemaps to Google’s Webmaster Tools, making sure to geo-target each of the subfolders containing the sitemaps to their intended target countries.

Specifically, we geo-targeted the folder www.revahealth.com/IE/ to Ireland, and put the sitemap with pages we want to target to an Irish audience into that folder. We did the same for the /UK/ subfolder.

By doing this we hope to improve our rankings on Google.ie and Google.co.uk, and to increase traffic to our UK and Irish pages. Setting a geographic target in Google Webmaster Tools shouldn’t impact our pages’ positions in the search results unless the user chooses the “pages from Ireland” or “pages from the UK” option. That’s why this experiment seems less risky and shouldn’t jeopardise our positions on Google.com.

We will keep you informed if we see any positive or negative effects. Have any of you tried this or something similar in the past? Leave us a comment and let us know how it worked out for you.

[UPDATE - 16/02/2010]

We’ve finished testing this now so go have a read of the results of our geo-targeted sitemaps test.

Tagged with:  
© 2010 WhatClinic.com Blog