The Auction Model

When we first set up RevaHealth.com our business model was very similar to Google AdWords. Clinics would effectively bid for position in our featured listings section according the treatments that they delivered and the market in which they operated. The model was very elegant for a number of reasons.

Firstly and most importantly it eliminated the need for us to price, and pricing is difficult. In fact pricing is incredibly difficult. This is because in order for the price you set to maximise your revenue it needs to reflect the value that the customer places on the product or service, and value is subjective. That means that the right price for one person is the wrong price for the next. (Take a read of Eoghan McCabe’s related post on the Contrast blog, You Are What You Charge.)

In our case we do business across 90 countries and about 1,000 treatments. Pricing across these 90,000 combinations would be impossible. So the second reason we liked the auction model was that in a liquid market auctions discover the value for you. They don’t discover the value to the highest bidder but they do uncover the value to the second highest bidder (unfairly referred to as the loser).  Pricing never uncovers this.

Thirdly, the auction model eliminated the risk of over pricing and excluding potential customers. This is always the worry of normal pricing, however with auctions it is the customer that sets the price, making over-pricing impossible. The customer can still feel that the price they’re paying is expensive, but they come up with the price and they choose to pay it.

So Why Didn’t Auctions Work For Us?

OK, so in a way the auction model kind of worked for us, but as hard as we tried we simply couldn’t get it to scale. There were four problems:

  1. Auctions require a liquid market. Put simply an auction with one bidder achieves nothing. When we started RevaHealth.com we were effectively dealing in a number of niche markets in the medical tourism field, and there wasn’t the required demand or liquidity in each market to ignite its own auction.
  2. Auctions require the bidders to be actively involved in the auction. Our customers simply didn’t want to be that heavily involved, they would rather have paid a fixed fee without the complexity of bidding. In fact, the only time our customers did change their bids was when we picked up the phone and told them they should.
  3. Auctions required educated bidders. Our customers at the time weren’t sophisticated marketers. They didn’t keep accurate and diligent marketing records and work out their ROIs. They spent their nights poring over medical records not marketing data. As a result they weren’t really sure what the value of our product was and therefore were uncertain about what they should bid.
  4. Finally the most important factor for why the auction model wasn’t the runaway success that we had envisioned was that our customers weren’t used to doing business that way.

What We Changed

We needed to find a way to sell to the people who didn’t “get” the auction model for one reason or another, i.e. the majority of our potential customers! We introduced featured listings with fixed annual pricing at four different price points. This was an immediate success and required a substantially shorter sales cycle as the product is already well understood by the customer base.

There were a lot of disadvantages to doing this, particularly for our customers. In an auction model, the risk they took on was linked directly to the value they received, i.e. they received leads or enquiries at a cost that they determined themselves. By paying a fixed annual fee irrespective of the number of enquiries generated, the link between the risk and the value was broken. However, the fact that the annual fee product was easy to understand and sell outweighed all of the disadvantages, for us at least. We still maintain the auction model as a premium feature on top of our featured listings for the customers that can see the value in it.

Could the auction model be applicable to your market? Have you tried it already? Let us know what the key determining factors in setting your prices are in the comments below.

Why Would You Pay 5,000 Times The Price?

If you want some good examples of how to optimise your company’s revenue, you only have to look as far as mobile phone operators and low cost airlines. I recently had the pleasure of experiencing both during a brief business trip to the UK.

Having booked my Ryanair flight at the last minute I ended up paying roughly three or four times what I would have normally paid if I’d just booked a few weeks in advance. The problem was, I didn’t know a few weeks in advance that I needed to travel. Even at this inflated price though, Ryanair were cheaper than the competition and won my business on price based on when I wanted to travel.

Then, when I arrived in the UK, I got the following text from O2 Ireland:

Data abroad costs €4.98 per MB. Each day you are charged for what you use up to 4MB and then usage to 50MB is free

I stared at the message in amazement. At home I buy my mobile data for €10 per GB but for the privilege of using data a mere 350 miles away they were going to charge me roughly 5,000 times the price. What I did next is even more amazing. I promptly switched over to my email application and blithely checked my email.

Why Pay More?

In this instance it wasn’t the price that mattered to me. Sure, the price matters to O2 – it’s their revenue after all – but what matters to me is the value. As long as the value exceeds price and there aren’t any easily available alternatives then I’m likely going to pay it. In this case being able to check my email with no other access to the internet was worth paying 5,000 times what it costs at home.

It was only later that I took the time to analyse the care and attention to detail that O2 had taken when coming up with this pricing plan, which no doubt maximises revenue but doesn’t exactly achieve price transparency.

O2 Ireland Data Roaming Pricing

Let’s take a look at how O2 arrange their pricing for data roaming. Even though the data is priced per KB, this pricing model encourages you to keep using it once you’ve started; otherwise you never get to the “free” data between 4MB and 50MB. Go over this magical 50MB limit, and you’re back to €4.98 per MB all the way up!

So why have O2 decided that the price / value dynamics tap out at €19.92? I reckon there are two reasons for this:

  1. Reducing Sticker Shock. When customers come home and get a €59.76 charge for three days of roaming data they get what is called sticker shock. This typically results in an angry customer ringing the support desk and shouting at an innocent operator. This ends in two ways. Either the operator has to swallow the cost or the customer is further enraged and switches provider at the first available opportunity. Either way it is in O2 Ireland’s interest to minimise the occurrence of sticker shock. By setting their normal daily ceiling at €19.92 they think they have achieved this.
  2. Front Loading Charges. The rather obvious reason that O2 engage in front loading is to get as much of the money as possible as quickly as possible. In this case O2 reckons €19.92 a day is most of the money. The think that most people will only use a small amount of data, so they make the first chunk as expensive as they think the market can bear. Then they “reward” heavier users who have already incurred a €19.92 charge with some “free” data. Finally, they really milk the heavy business users who go over the 50MB daily limit.

There are things to learn from both Ryanair’s constantly increasing prices as the day of departure arrives, and from O2 Ireland’s data roaming pricing structure depending on how they apply to your business. If you know that people are going to have to use your product at some point, making it cheap to buy in advance but expensive to buy on the day makes a lot of sense. If you have a large user base that only pay small amounts each, front loading can be an effective way of maximising revenue from this group, and there are usually a small number of heavy users at the other extreme who will pay a lot more than the average each.

Have you ever been caught out by last minute ticket prices? Have you ever paid €4.98 per MB for data abroad? Most importantly, what pricing models did you learn from when you set your prices?

Geo-Targeted Sitemaps – Update

Do you remember our experiment to split our sitemaps for geo-targeted SEO? Ten weeks ago we implemented multiple sitemaps to geo-target the UK and Ireland sections of our website to their intended audiences. The initial part was easy – it took a few minutes to create separate subfolders and set a target country in the Google’s Webmaster Tools. The harder part was to monitor its influence and measure the results.

We chose a control group of 200 pages and monitored their rankings on Google.com, Google.ie and Google.co.uk. Many competing factors can affect the position of a page in the search results but we were hoping that as a result of geo-targeting the British and Irish pages that they would improve their rankings on Google.co.uk and Google.ie respectively.

Unfortunately that’s not what happened. Our Irish pages dropped in the search results by 1-2 positions on average, both on Google.ie and Google.com. On the other hand, the UK pages improved their rankings by 2-3 positions both on Google.co.uk and Google.com. It’s impossible to draw a valid positive or negative conclusion based on these results. However, we can say it hasn’t been a success and that’s why we’ve stopped the experiment and gone back to the old way.

We’re not very disappointed by these results as everybody knows that SEO-ing a website on a .com domain, all in English, but targeted to audiences in many countries all around the world is not that easy. We keep trying though, testing, experimenting and sharing what we’ve learned with you. Do you have any other ideas we could try out?

Tagged with:  

How Quickly Can You Grow Your Business?

In business there are plenty of levers you can pull which will affect your company’s bottom line. Often the trouble is figuring out which ones to focus your efforts on. For established companies in mature markets the answer is nearly always to focus on the margin between your cost per acquisition and your revenue per customer. This is because the number of new customers you can hope to acquire is relatively fixed.

However, for young companies in new markets looking to grow quickly it can be far more worthwhile to look at the length of your sales process and payment cycle. The reason these levers are so important is that the faster you can recoup your initial marketing spend, the faster you can reinvest it in marketing again. (This applies equally to companies competing in a brand new market as to companies looking to massively disrupt an existing market.)

How Fast Can You Recycle Your Marketing Budget?

Recycling Your Marketing Spend Twice As Fast

Which company would you rather own?

In a market with a lot of potential customers the question of how quickly you can scale your business is largely dependent on how fast you can turn your marketing spend into revenue. Essentially, if you can use your marketing budget to acquire customers and convert those customers into cash, you can then reinvest this cash back into more marketing.

A company that has an initial marketing budget of €10k and can turn it into €15k in sales in one month is obviously going to grow much faster than one that takes two months to do the same, but how much of a difference could it make?

To answer this you need to look at these four factors.

  • How much does it cost you to make a sale?
  • How long is your sales cycle?
  • What is your average revenue?
  • How long is your payment cycle?

Worked Example

This example is massively simplified in order to solely examine the effect of speeding up your ability to recycle your marketing expenditure. In the example both companies have exactly the same business metrics with the exception that company B can recycle its marketing spend twice as fast as company A.

Company A:

  • Cost of customer acquisition: €10
  • Length of sales cycle: 1 month
  • Average revenue per customer: €15
  • Length of payment cycle: 1 month

With an initial investment into marketing of €10k this company can generate cash of €15k after two months. If it reinvests the whole €15k back into marketing it will have cash of €22.5k at the end of month four. After a year it will have just under €114k in cash.

Company B:

  • Cost of customer acquisition: €10
  • Length of sales cycle: 2 weeks
  • Average revenue per customer: €15
  • Length of payment cycle: 2 weeks

With an initial investment into marketing of €10k this company can generate cash of €15k after the first month. If it reinvests the whole €15k back into marketing it will have cash of €22.5k at the end of month two. After a year it will have nearly €1.3m in cash.

Conclusions

Halving the amount of time it takes to turn your marketing spend into cash can more than 10x your revenue over the course of one year. Another way to look at this is that the quicker you can recycle your marketing spend, the less capital you need.

In the example above, for company A to end the year with a similar amount of revenue as company B it would have to start with more than ten times the amount of capital.

By comparison, if company A looked to pull the pricing lever, it would need to be selling the same product as company B at nearly €25 instead of €15, i.e. triple the margin.

So, what can you do in your company that will help you speed up how quickly you can recycle your marketing spend?

  1. Tweak your business to get cash upfront for product instead of giving payment terms.
  2. Get payment terms on any marketing activities that you take

If you have any tips about how to speed up your sales or payment cycles, please let us know in the comments below.

When we first went about designing RevaHealth.com we had a very specific user flow in mind. Visitors to our site would arrive through a search term like ‘Dentists in Rathfarnham’. They would land on a specific search results page displaying dentists in Rathfarnham and then would narrow their search by location, treatment, etc. Then they would look at individual clinics’ profiles and compare them until they converted by contacting their chosen clinic.

Landing to Conversion Flow

Landing to Conversion Flow

But the best laid plans of mice of men and all that… Over time an increasing number of our visitors started landing not on our search results pages but directly on the profiles of individual clinics, arriving as a result of very long tail searches.

The problem we faced was that while our search results pages were designed specifically to be landing pages, our clinics’ profile pages were not. As a result of this our profile pages were suffering from a much higher bounce rate than our search results pages. For specific clinic types it was as much as 20% in the difference, and it averaged 10%.

Why Do Our Search Results Pages Work As Landing Pages?

If you search for ‘Dentists in Rathfarnahm’  in Google this is the result you will get:

Dentists in Rathfarnham

Dentists in Rathfarnham

If you click on this search result you should have a clear expectation of the type of page it will bring you to. In most cases the user will be expecting a page from a 3rd party site featuring several or all dentists in Rathfarnham, and this is the page we bring them to:

Rathfarnham Search Results

Rathfarnham Search Results

When the user lands on this page it is immediately clear that they have landed on a relevant page and therefore they don’t bounce.

Why Didn’t Our Clinic Profile Pages Work As Landing Pages?

If you search for the Rathfarnham Dental Practice in Google you get the following search result:

Rathfarnham Dental Practice

Rathfarnham Dental Practice

If you click on this link you are clearly expecting to find information about the Rathfarnham Dental Practice. Now look at the page we brought you to:

Rathfarnham Dental Practice Profile

Rathfarnham Dental Practice Profile

The most prominent branding on the page is RevaHealth.com, not Rathfarnham Dental Practice, and the relevant information is a third of the way down the page. Many users were landing on the page and hitting the back button before they discovered that we had the information they wanted.

So What Did We Change?

We dynamically alerted the page that the user was landing on it directly from Google, Yahoo, etc, or alternatively that they were navigating to it internally from RevaHealth.com.

When users were landing on the page we moved the RevaHealth.com logo and search boxes into the right hand gutter.  We promoted the clinic name into the main place on the page so that it didn’t get lost in the content.  We also added a stock photograph.

Updated Rathfarnham Dental Practice Profile

Updated Rathfarnham Dental Practice Profile

We intended for these changes to have to two effects:

  1. Move the relevant information further up the page
  2. Better meet the visitors’ expectations that they were landing on a page specifically about the clinic

What Were The Results?

The results of the experiment were far better than any of us anticipated:

  • The bounce rate on profile landing pages dropped by 6%
  • The average number of pages viewed by visitors who entered the site through profile landing pages went up by 19%
  • The average time spent on the site went up by just over 20%
  • The conversion rate increased by 14%
  • Advertising revenue decreased by 2%. We suspect this is because we were counting users who landed on the site and immediately clicked on advertising as having bounced. In addition, the advertising in the right hand gutter has been pushed below the fold.

Concerns

We do still have some concerns about this approach, mostly centring around the design of the site changing when a visitor navigates away from the clinic’s profile to the remainder of the site.

Let us know if you have any success or failure stories about increasing conversion and reducing bounce rates on your sites.

Tagged with:  
© 2010 WhatClinic.com Blog