<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Speed Of Irish Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.whatclinic.com/2010/05/the-speed-of-irish-websites.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2010/05/the-speed-of-irish-websites.html</link>
	<description>Sharing Tech, Marketing &#38; Health 2.0 information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:37:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2010/05/the-speed-of-irish-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-2015</link>
		<dc:creator>VJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 06:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=1113#comment-2015</guid>
		<description>This is a really very good post. I have a very important question....

How do we decrease the rendering time of the website ? I saw that your average rendering time is 1-1.5 sec. Can you please let me know if there are tips for that ....

VJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really very good post. I have a very important question&#8230;.</p>
<p>How do we decrease the rendering time of the website ? I saw that your average rendering time is 1-1.5 sec. Can you please let me know if there are tips for that &#8230;.</p>
<p>VJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor McDermottroe</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2010/05/the-speed-of-irish-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor McDermottroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=1113#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the suggestion Patrick. I hadn&#039;t seen that tool before. Off to my Win7 VM I go... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the suggestion Patrick. I hadn&#8217;t seen that tool before. Off to my Win7 VM I go&#8230; <img src='http://blog.whatclinic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Meenan</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2010/05/the-speed-of-irish-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Meenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=1113#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>If you haven&#039;t tried it yet, Dynatrace Ajax edition is a really good (and free) javascript profiler for finding those client-side time problems (if they are within your control).

9 times out of 10 on most of the sites I have looked at it is caused by using selectors inefficiently (and repeatedly) for accessing DOM elements.

You can get it here: http://ajax.dynatrace.com/pages/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t tried it yet, Dynatrace Ajax edition is a really good (and free) javascript profiler for finding those client-side time problems (if they are within your control).</p>
<p>9 times out of 10 on most of the sites I have looked at it is caused by using selectors inefficiently (and repeatedly) for accessing DOM elements.</p>
<p>You can get it here: <a href="http://ajax.dynatrace.com/pages/" rel="nofollow">http://ajax.dynatrace.com/pages/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor McDermottroe</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2010/05/the-speed-of-irish-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-1827</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor McDermottroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 20:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=1113#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind mention of boards.ie!

We&#039;re very conscious of the speed of boards.ie and we track it constantly and try to improve it when we can. The tricky part for us at the moment is that 75%+ of the time to fully load a page is client-side time. We still have lots of work to do!

The Firefox plugins YSlow and Google Page Speed are worth using to help do a similar job to webpagetest.org. The &quot;Net&quot; tab of Firebug is also very useful to track down download order/caching issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind mention of boards.ie!</p>
<p>We&#8217;re very conscious of the speed of boards.ie and we track it constantly and try to improve it when we can. The tricky part for us at the moment is that 75%+ of the time to fully load a page is client-side time. We still have lots of work to do!</p>
<p>The Firefox plugins YSlow and Google Page Speed are worth using to help do a similar job to webpagetest.org. The &#8220;Net&#8221; tab of Firebug is also very useful to track down download order/caching issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caelen King</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2010/05/the-speed-of-irish-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-1823</link>
		<dc:creator>Caelen King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 13:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=1113#comment-1823</guid>
		<description>It is true about Google taking speed into consideration however I don&#039;t believe it is an important factor. They say that it only affects 1% of search results. I wouldn&#039;t really stress about speed from an SEO perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true about Google taking speed into consideration however I don&#8217;t believe it is an important factor. They say that it only affects 1% of search results. I wouldn&#8217;t really stress about speed from an SEO perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aedan Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2010/05/the-speed-of-irish-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-1796</link>
		<dc:creator>Aedan Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 23:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=1113#comment-1796</guid>
		<description>Hi Caelan, 
Very interesting post. I have previously looked at page load speed in the Google webmaster tools before but the level of detail in webpagetest is much better. As promised I have checked the puddleducks site and the results are as follows. For the first view it took 6.2 secs and for the repeat view it took 4.3 secs. The start render was around 2 secs. We have a very image rich home page and the report states that we can gain a lot of time by ensuring that all images are compressed. So we have a bit of work to do to improve and I&#039;ll be onto our web developers to make them.
BTW - as well as hopefully decreasing bounce rate I understand that improving load speed can also have a beneficial impact on Google search ranking as stated in this vid: http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleWebmasterHelp#p/u/4/UbaU-p2UnkA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Caelan,<br />
Very interesting post. I have previously looked at page load speed in the Google webmaster tools before but the level of detail in webpagetest is much better. As promised I have checked the puddleducks site and the results are as follows. For the first view it took 6.2 secs and for the repeat view it took 4.3 secs. The start render was around 2 secs. We have a very image rich home page and the report states that we can gain a lot of time by ensuring that all images are compressed. So we have a bit of work to do to improve and I&#8217;ll be onto our web developers to make them.<br />
BTW &#8211; as well as hopefully decreasing bounce rate I understand that improving load speed can also have a beneficial impact on Google search ranking as stated in this vid: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleWebmasterHelp#p/u/4/UbaU-p2UnkA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleWebmasterHelp#p/u/4/UbaU-p2UnkA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caelen King</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2010/05/the-speed-of-irish-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Caelen King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 14:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=1113#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>Hi John and thanks for stopping by. You are right about external advertising services slowing things down. Analytics is now available in async mode which mitigates its overhead and it is easy to get gzipping working IIS (we run on IIS). However, the real problem with the the two papers is that they don&#039;t combine their gifs/pngs into a sprite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John and thanks for stopping by. You are right about external advertising services slowing things down. Analytics is now available in async mode which mitigates its overhead and it is easy to get gzipping working IIS (we run on IIS). However, the real problem with the the two papers is that they don&#8217;t combine their gifs/pngs into a sprite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCormac</title>
		<link>http://blog.whatclinic.com/2010/05/the-speed-of-irish-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>John McCormac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 13:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.revahealth.com/?p=1113#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>One of the biggest problems affecting some website speed tests is the reliance on external analytics such as GA. The use of external ads servers (Adsense etc) also slows things down a bit. RTE.ie, Irishtimes.com and Independent.ie would be very heavy in this respect. What is fascinating about Irish websites in general is the way that few use mod_deflate or compression. Some of this might be down larger websites using IIS rather than Apache but with Google claiming that website speed and page load times are going play a part in its algorithm, some people are beginning to pay attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest problems affecting some website speed tests is the reliance on external analytics such as GA. The use of external ads servers (Adsense etc) also slows things down a bit. RTE.ie, Irishtimes.com and Independent.ie would be very heavy in this respect. What is fascinating about Irish websites in general is the way that few use mod_deflate or compression. Some of this might be down larger websites using IIS rather than Apache but with Google claiming that website speed and page load times are going play a part in its algorithm, some people are beginning to pay attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

