Generic Keywords And Locations

Following on from our posts about geo-targeting for SEO and keyword length I was doing a little more research into our keywords. I noticed for the first time that some of our top 50 keywords were single words like “dentist” or “braces”, so I took a look at where the users were who did these searches and where they landed on the site.

Searches for "Dentist" landing on RevaHealth.com

Searches for "Dentist" landing on RevaHealth.com

Looking at the numbers the traffic really isn’t that significant by itself. What is interesting though is what Google is doing. When a user searches for a generic keyword, i.e. one that doesn’t include any qualifier – location in our case, Google is determining where the user is and trying to serve relevant results based on this. Best of all for us, they seem to be doing quite a good job of it too!

We have spent a lot of time over the years making sure all our SEO elements (URL, page title, etc) include location information on the basis that it reflects the content of the page and that users include it in their searches. Now it seems that Google are using this information to determine the location relevancy of the content of our pages.

While the location specificity is quite coarse in the example above, only going down to a country level, it will be interesting to see if over the coming months the landing URLs change to counties or cities, i.e. a user in Dublin lands on our page about dentists in Dublin rather than dentists in Ireland.

Keyword Analysis Tools?

During the last month 87% the quarter of a million keywords used to find RevaHealth.com were unique. The good thing about this is that it means our long tail SEO is working well. The bad news is that it makes it harder to get an overall picture of which keyword phrases or broad match pairs and triplets are doing particularly well.

If you have any recommendations for good tools to analyse the keyword data we have I’d love to hear about them. Just leave a comment below.

I was reading this article by Barney Austen on Bloggertone and got to thinking about all the things people waste money on when starting their own businesses. There are tons of things that you think are really important to have or do. Many of them really are not.

Here at RevaHealth.com we were no different to any other start up. We invested time and money into areas that should have been left to much later in our development cycle. Here is a list of areas that on reflection we either should have ignored or that we managed to get away without.

A Logo
We still don’t have a logo and don’t have any plans to get a logo. We just typed out RevaHealth.com in a font that we liked and left it at that.

Stationary
We still don’t have any. It was a bit of a pain getting some things set up without any, like a business account with Vodafone, but we managed without and we are still managing without.

Business Cards
We did without business cards for a year and even after getting them printed I keep forgetting them. If your business isn’t based around meeting people face to face then business cards aren’t one of the first things that you need.

A CRM System
We spent a huge amount of effort in the early days evaluating CRM systems. This was at a time when we could list all our customers on the back of a napkin. Eventually we deployed Salesforce at huge cost. After a year we abandoned it and went to Highrise. This still didn’t do the job (more about this in a later post) and most of the company reverted to spreadsheets and notebooks.

We now have our own home-grown CRM system which works like a dream, but we couldn’t have created it in the beginning as we didn’t know the way our business would be shaped in the future. Fundamentally we would have been significantly better off if we hadn’t looked at any form of CRM until we had hundreds of customers and a well defined business. I think many start-ups would be in the same boat and that CRM systems are not something that you should be looking at during the early stages of a business.

A Sales Process
Unless you have already done business in exactly the same business environment and your business model is established and well understood then you can’t have a sales process. Inventing one prior to this is pointless and akin to throwing darts drunk, blindfolded and standing on one leg.

An Intranet
Most of us have worked in companies where a corporate intranet was badly implemented and used.  When I started RevaHealth.com I was determined that ours would be implemented and used correctly. The truth of the matter is that it simply wasn’t required. For small companies the natural organic methods of sharing information are much more efficient. We do use our intranet effectively but it has a much smaller role than we envisioned.

A Server
I spent a good man week deploying and poorly configuring an internal server. It now sits in the corner gathering dust. We don’t have any active servers in our office anymore – everything is in the cloud: Mail server, development servers, intranet, source control … everything.

A Brand Name
This is probably important, however we gotten away with a fairly bland and meaningless one so far. I’m not entirely convinced that if we changed our one overnight that anyone would notice.

A Finished Product
Luckily this isn’t a mistake that we made. We deployed product as quickly as possible and iterated every week from that point on. However, this is a mistake that I see start-up companies making every day. They think that they have to get the technology correct before they start doing business. Whereas they need to start doing business before they can figure out what the correct technology is.

Legally Binding Terms & Conditions
Legally binding to what? A typically start-up changes its business so often that any agreements are outdated as soon as the paper dries. It’s probably best to start with standardised creative commons terms & conditions until your business firms up.

So, when you started up your own business what did you spend time or money on that you needn’t have?

Tagged with:  

Is The Long Tail Getting Longer?

I was prompted by reading a couple of recent blog posts to examine the relationship between traffic to RevaHealth.com and the length of the keywords that people are using to find pages on our site. The first article I read was from Matt McGee at Small Business Search Marketing which said that “One-Word Searches [were] Up 17% in 2009“. The other was by Jody at Marketing Jive, which said “Long-Tail Dead? Unlikely“.

Both Matt and Jody were looking at sets of data from Experian Hitwise, a well respected source of internet usage data. However, both were coming to fairly different conclusions. My initial thought on reading the articles was to wonder how the ongoing changes to Google, Bing and the others over the last year had affected our traffic, specifically in relation to keyword lengths. My supposition was that the keywords would be getting shorter, not longer, especially due to the roll out of localised search results on Google.

I was wrong.

Keyword Length vs Traffic

Keyword Length vs Traffic

As you can see over the course of the year the length of the keywords that people are using to find our site is getting longer, not shorter. The proportion of traffic resulting from keywords with 1 or 2 words in them has dropped significantly, while proportion from keywords of length 4 and up have all increased, in some cases quite dramatically.

Why Should This Matter To You?

So, what if anything does this all mean for you and your website? Well, first of all I’d say that whatever SEO related research you read on the web, you need to think carefully about how it relates to your site. RevaHealth.com is a site with millions of pages of varying complexity. We know that our success thus far comes from successfully capturing large parts of the long tail in relation to health clinics, so our keyword length graph has always been skewed. In February of this year less that 2% of our traffic came from searches involving single word keywords. Hitwise on the other hand is saying that in general over 20% of searches involve just one keyword.

We’re clearly not yet winning the race for single keywords like “dentists” or “doctors”, but thinking about it for a minute what would we do if we were? Without knowing exactly where the user is we couldn’t even return a decent search result for them. We are normally able to determine the country they are in, but after that it is hit and miss. So a person in Hartlepool who searches for “dentists” would likely land on our dentists worldwide or dentists in the UK pages. Neither of these are really what they’re looking for, so they’ll probably bounce. This then is a problem for both the search engines and ourselves. How do they connect the user who uses just one keyword to the information they need?

The answer has to lie with the user making their actual location available to the browser they are using more often, but until this does happen, I would have to agree with a point Jody made; as web users get more search engine savvy, they are going to use more keywords not less to find exactly what they want. For us at least, the long tail is getting longer, not shorter.

Are you noticing the keywords that drive your traffic getting any longer or shorter, or are you even looking at them?

The Auction Model

When we first set up RevaHealth.com our business model was very similar to Google AdWords. Clinics would effectively bid for position in our featured listings section according the treatments that they delivered and the market in which they operated. The model was very elegant for a number of reasons.

Firstly and most importantly it eliminated the need for us to price, and pricing is difficult. In fact pricing is incredibly difficult. This is because in order for the price you set to maximise your revenue it needs to reflect the value that the customer places on the product or service, and value is subjective. That means that the right price for one person is the wrong price for the next. (Take a read of Eoghan McCabe’s related post on the Contrast blog, You Are What You Charge.)

In our case we do business across 90 countries and about 1,000 treatments. Pricing across these 90,000 combinations would be impossible. So the second reason we liked the auction model was that in a liquid market auctions discover the value for you. They don’t discover the value to the highest bidder but they do uncover the value to the second highest bidder (unfairly referred to as the loser).  Pricing never uncovers this.

Thirdly, the auction model eliminated the risk of over pricing and excluding potential customers. This is always the worry of normal pricing, however with auctions it is the customer that sets the price, making over-pricing impossible. The customer can still feel that the price they’re paying is expensive, but they come up with the price and they choose to pay it.

So Why Didn’t Auctions Work For Us?

OK, so in a way the auction model kind of worked for us, but as hard as we tried we simply couldn’t get it to scale. There were four problems:

  1. Auctions require a liquid market. Put simply an auction with one bidder achieves nothing. When we started RevaHealth.com we were effectively dealing in a number of niche markets in the medical tourism field, and there wasn’t the required demand or liquidity in each market to ignite its own auction.
  2. Auctions require the bidders to be actively involved in the auction. Our customers simply didn’t want to be that heavily involved, they would rather have paid a fixed fee without the complexity of bidding. In fact, the only time our customers did change their bids was when we picked up the phone and told them they should.
  3. Auctions required educated bidders. Our customers at the time weren’t sophisticated marketers. They didn’t keep accurate and diligent marketing records and work out their ROIs. They spent their nights poring over medical records not marketing data. As a result they weren’t really sure what the value of our product was and therefore were uncertain about what they should bid.
  4. Finally the most important factor for why the auction model wasn’t the runaway success that we had envisioned was that our customers weren’t used to doing business that way.

What We Changed

We needed to find a way to sell to the people who didn’t “get” the auction model for one reason or another, i.e. the majority of our potential customers! We introduced featured listings with fixed annual pricing at four different price points. This was an immediate success and required a substantially shorter sales cycle as the product is already well understood by the customer base.

There were a lot of disadvantages to doing this, particularly for our customers. In an auction model, the risk they took on was linked directly to the value they received, i.e. they received leads or enquiries at a cost that they determined themselves. By paying a fixed annual fee irrespective of the number of enquiries generated, the link between the risk and the value was broken. However, the fact that the annual fee product was easy to understand and sell outweighed all of the disadvantages, for us at least. We still maintain the auction model as a premium feature on top of our featured listings for the customers that can see the value in it.

Could the auction model be applicable to your market? Have you tried it already? Let us know what the key determining factors in setting your prices are in the comments below.

Geo-Targeted Sitemaps – Update

Do you remember our experiment to split our sitemaps for geo-targeted SEO? Ten weeks ago we implemented multiple sitemaps to geo-target the UK and Ireland sections of our website to their intended audiences. The initial part was easy – it took a few minutes to create separate subfolders and set a target country in the Google’s Webmaster Tools. The harder part was to monitor its influence and measure the results.

We chose a control group of 200 pages and monitored their rankings on Google.com, Google.ie and Google.co.uk. Many competing factors can affect the position of a page in the search results but we were hoping that as a result of geo-targeting the British and Irish pages that they would improve their rankings on Google.co.uk and Google.ie respectively.

Unfortunately that’s not what happened. Our Irish pages dropped in the search results by 1-2 positions on average, both on Google.ie and Google.com. On the other hand, the UK pages improved their rankings by 2-3 positions both on Google.co.uk and Google.com. It’s impossible to draw a valid positive or negative conclusion based on these results. However, we can say it hasn’t been a success and that’s why we’ve stopped the experiment and gone back to the old way.

We’re not very disappointed by these results as everybody knows that SEO-ing a website on a .com domain, all in English, but targeted to audiences in many countries all around the world is not that easy. We keep trying though, testing, experimenting and sharing what we’ve learned with you. Do you have any other ideas we could try out?

Tagged with:  

When we first went about designing RevaHealth.com we had a very specific user flow in mind. Visitors to our site would arrive through a search term like ‘Dentists in Rathfarnham’. They would land on a specific search results page displaying dentists in Rathfarnham and then would narrow their search by location, treatment, etc. Then they would look at individual clinics’ profiles and compare them until they converted by contacting their chosen clinic.

Landing to Conversion Flow

Landing to Conversion Flow

But the best laid plans of mice of men and all that… Over time an increasing number of our visitors started landing not on our search results pages but directly on the profiles of individual clinics, arriving as a result of very long tail searches.

The problem we faced was that while our search results pages were designed specifically to be landing pages, our clinics’ profile pages were not. As a result of this our profile pages were suffering from a much higher bounce rate than our search results pages. For specific clinic types it was as much as 20% in the difference, and it averaged 10%.

Why Do Our Search Results Pages Work As Landing Pages?

If you search for ‘Dentists in Rathfarnahm’  in Google this is the result you will get:

Dentists in Rathfarnham

Dentists in Rathfarnham

If you click on this search result you should have a clear expectation of the type of page it will bring you to. In most cases the user will be expecting a page from a 3rd party site featuring several or all dentists in Rathfarnham, and this is the page we bring them to:

Rathfarnham Search Results

Rathfarnham Search Results

When the user lands on this page it is immediately clear that they have landed on a relevant page and therefore they don’t bounce.

Why Didn’t Our Clinic Profile Pages Work As Landing Pages?

If you search for the Rathfarnham Dental Practice in Google you get the following search result:

Rathfarnham Dental Practice

Rathfarnham Dental Practice

If you click on this link you are clearly expecting to find information about the Rathfarnham Dental Practice. Now look at the page we brought you to:

Rathfarnham Dental Practice Profile

Rathfarnham Dental Practice Profile

The most prominent branding on the page is RevaHealth.com, not Rathfarnham Dental Practice, and the relevant information is a third of the way down the page. Many users were landing on the page and hitting the back button before they discovered that we had the information they wanted.

So What Did We Change?

We dynamically alerted the page that the user was landing on it directly from Google, Yahoo, etc, or alternatively that they were navigating to it internally from RevaHealth.com.

When users were landing on the page we moved the RevaHealth.com logo and search boxes into the right hand gutter.  We promoted the clinic name into the main place on the page so that it didn’t get lost in the content.  We also added a stock photograph.

Updated Rathfarnham Dental Practice Profile

Updated Rathfarnham Dental Practice Profile

We intended for these changes to have to two effects:

  1. Move the relevant information further up the page
  2. Better meet the visitors’ expectations that they were landing on a page specifically about the clinic

What Were The Results?

The results of the experiment were far better than any of us anticipated:

  • The bounce rate on profile landing pages dropped by 6%
  • The average number of pages viewed by visitors who entered the site through profile landing pages went up by 19%
  • The average time spent on the site went up by just over 20%
  • The conversion rate increased by 14%
  • Advertising revenue decreased by 2%. We suspect this is because we were counting users who landed on the site and immediately clicked on advertising as having bounced. In addition, the advertising in the right hand gutter has been pushed below the fold.

Concerns

We do still have some concerns about this approach, mostly centring around the design of the site changing when a visitor navigates away from the clinic’s profile to the remainder of the site.

Let us know if you have any success or failure stories about increasing conversion and reducing bounce rates on your sites.

Tagged with:  

Labelling the World

Composite image of the Earth at night.

I’ve been looking a lot at the way we locate things, through maps and through the naming of things. Our addresses are weird things to begin with. We usually start by naming the place we are in and then move outwards in increments into the world around us. It shows some of the evolution of our idea of position.

In the past we wrote our address and most of the people who read it would know within the first few words who and where we were: “Oh that’s Joe who lives in the next village over” they would say, and that would be an end of it. They wouldn’t have to think about Counties, States, or Countries. Who talked to people in other countries anyway, except kings and their like?

Nowadays the world has grown smaller, and in many ways it would be preferable to have an address that narrowed with each phrase, each increment bringing the sender closer to the addressee. In the online world, our lovely folk-evolved addresses seem more trouble than they’re worth. Wouldn’t it be nice to have a little code we could parse?

Well, of course, some such mechanisms exist, but many of them are old things that evolved out of archaic postal systems and are still maintained for those systems. What should it matter to me how a postman is routed from his supply depot?

Something like Geohash on the other hand provides a code for all places on the earth, much like latitudes and longitudes, and to a high degree of accuracy – it’s a sphere, it’s not too hard. So, we can easily choose one system for everywhere on earth, and not have different systems for the UK, USA, China, India, etc. Just one common system.

We can then leave it up to each postal service to translate that system to their old postal code thingy, and we have no barrier to entry to the finding places game. The resulting addresses are nice and simple too, but even though the code-to-place procedure becomes more open and accessible, it would still be nice not to have to type a code into a phone to find out you are going just round the corner. Well, a Wikipedia type thing (not Wikipedia though, we’re not all worth an encyclopedia entry) could easily map locations to names, and using semantic web structures we could get to know a lot about each place we bother to name.

My own country (Ireland) has always been blessed by the ability of putting things off for a long time. Sometimes this enables it, when it finally gets round to doing things, to adopt systems unencumbered by legacy. So, if we choose to have an encoding for places, why not use Geohash or an equivalent?

If the Irish postal system wants to connect their own system to this it should be relatively simple, and we won’t be left with some debacle like those poor people in the UK, whose once public, now private(-ish) postal system had it’s postcode system adopted as a de facto identifier standard, even though it’s not a particularly good identifier, except for delivering mail. And just to make matters worse, their government, who are supposedly interested in unlocking innovation through free access to public sector data and information, continue to allow the postal system to charge for access to the postcode system!

Thank god my government is bound to:

  • Learn from this, and not spend millions on some new weird standard.
  • Choose, or make, a freely available system.
  • Quickly reap the benefits.

That’s what we’re going to do, right?…

Tim.

Tagged with:  

When Advanced Segments in Google Analytics were introduced just over a year ago I was delighted. Finally there was an easy way to slice our website data in more than one dimension at a time. By setting up an advanced segment for just “Organic Visitors from the United States” for instance I could really drill down into what a specific set of users were doing on the site and see how their behaviour differed from the norm.

Every now and again though I used to see some strange results come back for reports I was doing. At the start I put this down to the feature being in Beta, but the anomalies didn’t go away. Having come back to use advanced segments in recent days to dig into some very specific user behaviour I noticed the problem was still there so I decided to find out what was causing it.

As an example, when I did a search (filter) in my top content report for all the URLs containing “/dentists/” I got a figure of 313,000 page views for the period of time I was looking at. However, if I swapped out the filter and used an advanced segment I had set up to do the same thing (i.e. only include data for pages that contained “/dentists/” in the URL) I got a figure of 434,000 page views, and I could see pages that clearly didn’t match the segment I thought I had setup.

At this stage the difference was far too big to ignore, and I assumed that lots of other users would be aware of it too. I was right. The Google Analytics help forum was full of questions about why data sliced with filters wasn’t matching data sliced by advanced segments.

The answer came in one line from a guy called MikeOstrowskiASU. He said simply that “Advanced segments are based on visitor sessions.”

Suddenly it was all clear. The advanced segments when used on the top content report were bringing back all the pages visited by anyone who had visited a page with “/dentists/” in the URL during their session rather than just the pages with “/dentists/” in the URL.

Just to confuse matters, advanced segments on visitor reports do match up with filtering because they are based on user sessions. For instance, using an advanced segment for “Visitors from the United Kingdom” on the visitors report will match up with going into the Map Overlay and clicking on the UK.

So, the moral of the story is be careful how you use advanced segments and what you infer from the data you get back. They might not be doing what you think they are.

Have you had a similar problem with Google Analytics, and have you found any workaround for it?

Breadcrumbs

Website Breadcrumbs

Bank in September we made several changes to RevaHealth.com to improve visitor engagement. One of these changes was to add breadcrumbs into the header of the page for visitors that want to broaden their search criteria. We weren’t 100% sure about this feature and we have been keeping an eye on our metrics to see what their effect is.

Overall we were very happy with the results of the experiment. Bounce rate was down by about 4% and the average number of pages viewed was up by 15%. Best of all conversion levels also increased, and not just because less people were bouncing. So we were happy, right?

Well no actually. Since we had made several changes at the same time and only done A/B split testing and not multivariate testing we did not know which changes had contributed to the positive effect. This is a frustrating state of affairs because although the overall effect was positive certain features may actually have been having a negative effect but were being compensated for by the other positive ones.

So in order to get a better picture of what had worked and what hadn’t we dug through our logs and metrics looking for anything out of the ordinary and we discovered some startling information.  Despite the breadcrumbs occupying some of the best real estate on the page almost no one was clicking on them.

Over the two month period of November and December the breadcrumbs were clicked on 18,000 times by 15,000 visitors. Over these two months we had 700,000 visitors (note December is a seasonally low traffic month) visiting 2.9 million pages.  Just 2.1% of visitors were clicking on the crumbs resulting in less than 0.7% of all pages viewed.

So The Breadcrumbs Were A Failure?

Unfortunately life isn’t that simple. The breadcrumbs may have had other benefits that their poor usage was masking. It could be that their presence on the page put the information being displayed into better context for the user resulting in our reduced in bounce rate or it could be that they were the catalyst that increased the conversion rate.  However, since we didn’t do multivariate testing there was no way for us to tell with our data.

So What Can We Do?

It’s simple really – we’re going to do more testing.  We are going to roll out a version of site without the breadcrumbs to see if their presence has any affect on our bounce or conversion rates. Once again this is going to be a straight A/B test rather than multivariate testing. If by having the breadcrumbs on the page we don’t observe a noticeable reduction in our bounce rate or an increase in our conversion rate, then we will have to ask ourselves whether we could be using that prime real estate more effectively.

Do you use breadcrumbs on your site? Do your visitors use them at all or are they there purely for information purposes?

Tagged with:  

The Cheapest Advert You’ll Ever Get

Every time a search engine results page displays a snippet of one of your web pages it is an advertisement for your website. In one way it is a free advert, but another way of looking at it is that you have paid for it through the cost of creating, publishing and marketing your content.

The search engines provide you with two lines to get your unique selling proposition across to the user and it is amazing the number of sites that rank well but fail to take advantage of this. The two lines I’m talking about are the content below the title and above the URL in the search results.

RevaHealth.com - Google Search Result

Companies agonize over their Google AdWords text, endlessly tweaking and A/B testing, determined to egg out every last cent of value. These same companies don’t expend the same effort in optimizing the flavour text that the search engines display in their search results.  This makes no sense! Increasing the click through rate of a well ranking organic search result, one that appears in the top five results say, will always have a greater effect on your traffic than any increases you can bring about using CPC traffic for the same keyword.

So How Do You Control The Flavour Text That Google Displays?

The bad news is that you can’t completely. Google will typically take a section of text off your page that is most relevant to the user’s query.

The good news is that while you can’t control it completely you can control it for your main keywords. This is done through the Meta Description field on your page. If Google trusts your site then there is a very good chance that it will display your Meta Description as the flavour text in its search results.

If Google isn’t displaying your Meta Description for your main keywords then look at the section that it is displaying. You should now modify this section so that you get the most from your listing in Google.

What Should Your Advert Look Like?

Make It Eye-catching. When you buy a newspaper ad in your local newspaper they charge for two things: the size of the advert and the position in the paper. Size matters. The bigger your advert is the better, so make sure you use up all of the available space that the search engines allow. After all they’ve given it to you – use it. Just make sure you don’t use more space that they have given you and have half your killer sales message cut off.

Get Your Keywords In. Even though it doesn’t matter from a ranking perspective Google will bold any words that match the keywords that the user has searched for.  Take a look at the flowers example below and notice in the flavour text that the words buy and flowers are highlighted. Google does this so users will easily be able to see which results are relevant to them.  The bold words stand out and attract the eye. Don’t forget that your search result is an advert for your site – you want it to stand out as much as possible.

Include A Call to Action. Whatever your site does – tell the user to do it. If you sell books say ‘Buy books’, if you process tax refunds say ‘Get your tax back’, if you do restaurant bookings say ‘Book a table at your favourite restaurant’.

Include Your Main Selling Points.

Online flower retailing is a highly competitive business, and it is easy to see which companies get it right when it comes to their search results. Take a look at the example below; the three companies shown have clear unique selling points in their search results.

Make The Advert Unique And Relevant

Each page on your site should have a unique Meta Description.  If you don’t make them unique you are reducing the chances that Google will use them. This is because if they aren’t unique Google knows that they don’t accurately reflect the actual content on your page (Google Webmaster Tools will tell you which of your pages have duplicate descriptions).

Worked Example – Online Flower Retailers

The online flower business is highly competitive and as an industry SEO is absolutely vital so we should expect these guys to get it right.

Eye-Catching – All three get the main keyword ‘buy flowers’ in their results text and therefore get good bolding. Similarly all three sites use close to all of the available space without any loss of meaning.

Call To Action – Interestingly 1800flowers.com doesn’t start with a call to action. Instead they focus on a sales message. This wouldn’t be what I would do. That said, I have to assume that they do it because it works.  Both of the other two start with strong calls to action: ‘Order Flowers’ and ‘Buy Flowers’. If I was in the market to buy some flowers I think I would have a strong positive reaction to these calls to action.

Main Selling Points – Buyflowersonline.com gets three selling points in addition to their call to action. Proflowers (which incidentally has one of the highest conversion rate of any website at 42%) gets four selling points in.

In my opinion 1800flowers.com is getting fewer clicks than its position would merit because they aren’t using the space Google has given them as effectively as their competition.

As an interesting aside you may like to know that the letters ‘e’ and ‘r’ are commonly mistyped when they appear beside each other in a word. If you look at the second listing above you will see that buyflowersonline.com is targeting these errors by putting ‘flowres’ at the end of their page title (the first line of the search results) and when you search for this in Google they jump straight to the top.

Have you any tips for what to include in your Page Title, Meta Description or URL to make your search result more clickable?

© 2010 WhatClinic.com Blog