Slice of pie

How much do you keep for yourself?

Too many people regard a revenue share agreement with their partners or affiliates as a zero sum game. They think of it as a pie and the bigger the slice the partner takes the less there is left for them.

If this were true then companies would set their sales people’s compensation to zero; after all it’s a zero sum game so why not take all of the revenue?

However this simply isn’t true. It’s not a zero sum game. Every sales organization knows that putting the right compensation package in place actually increases the size of the pie. So, if you pay your sales people a fixed salary only and have sales of €1 million you could conceivably double your sales by adding a 10% commission to your sales team’s compensation.

Everybody understands this simple idea but most instantly forget it when talking to a channel partner or affiliate. All of a sudden defences go up and a confrontational approach to negotiation is adopted. Too often business owners and sales people congratulate themselves after a negotiation where they manage to squeeze an extra 5% out of the channel. The reality here is that it is likely that no value was created and in all probability value was destroyed.

You must give your channel sufficient compensation to motivate them to sell your product. If you don’t they’ll find something else to sell and ignore your product. Give them more compensation and the chances are they’ll sell more of it.

The question everyone negotiating with a partner should be asking themselves is not “How little can I give them?”, rather it is “If I give the channel a greater share will I make more money?”.

Get Realistic About Your Channels Costs

Chances are no one call sell your product or service as cheaply as you can. After all, you know your product the best, you know the end-customer the best and you know how to sell it the best. In just about all cases a channel is going to find it more difficult and more costly to make a sale than you are.

You cannot get your revenue share agreement right without facing up to the reality of how much it costs to sell your product. I personally know SAAS companies that do not recover the selling costs associated with a new customer until well into year two.  This is quite typically in the SAAS world which relies on high levels of customer renewal for profitability.

However, these very same companies conveniently ignore this fact when they start setting channel revenue share agreements. 50% of first year’s revenue, dropping to 20% is thought of as generous. THESE PEOPLE ARE MAD. If they can’t sell it for 100% of the first year revenue themselves and it’s their baby, how on earth is it reasonable or fair to expect a half motivated channel to be able to sell it for 50% of that.

Remember, the channel’s sales people have their own targets to worry about. It might be their monthly or quarterly target, or even their yearly target, but it is never next year’s target. So don’t fool yourself into thinking that a percentage of future revenue is going to do anything to motivate them.

You have to structure a deal that at a minimum motivates their sales people and covers the partner’s total costs associated with making the sales (not forgetting opportunity costs). Once you’ve done this ask yourself the question: “Will I earn more money by giving them a greater revenue share?”.

Tagged with:  

Pellevé Launched In Ireland

Face Ironing or Pellevé

Kambiz Golchin performs a Pellevé treatment

Pellevé is the latest entry into the non-invasive or non-surgical face lift market, and was launched in Ireland yesterday by Mr Kambiz Golchin from the About Face Clinic. Pellevé uses radio frequencies to modify the collagen bundles deep beneath the skin giving an immediate tightening effect. Over the next six months the collagen begins to re-knit, continuously tightening which should give ongoing results. The application of radio frequencies causes a warming sensation leading to the nickname “face ironing”.

One of the biggest advantages of Pellevé is that is does not require any downtime as it causes no damage to the visible outer layers of the skin. Patients generally require two or three treatments to start with, followed by one treatment every 6 months to maintain the results. About Face Clinic are currently offering the treatment at €650 per session, a significant discount on UK prices, where it can cost as much as £1,200 per session.

Irish patients interested in the treatment can contact the About Face Clinic directly by clicking here or by calling 01 9010125 ext. 62949. Clinics that offer the treatment can add it to their listing by logging into their account or contacting their account manager.

For more information about this new treatment you can visit www.Pelleve.com, and you can watch Mr Golchin perform the treatment in this video from TV3.

Tagged with:  

Returning Visitors And Rebranding

rebranding conversion rate impact

Rebranding or natural falloff?

One of the side effects of our rebranding from RevaHealth.com to WhatClinic.com is that visitors who originally came to the site before the middle of August last year generally aren’t aware of the name change. Over the last few months we’ve been going back to visitors who didn’t successfully choose a clinic on their first attempt and asking them to come back and try again. As you can see from the chart above, those who were already familiar with the name change convert significantly better than those who weren’t.

There is of course a natural falloff in conversion rates, as you can see even in the difference between visitors from November and visitors from September, but I’d be inclined to attribute most of the step fall in return visitor conversion to the name change itself. It’s just another thing to keep in mind if you consider rebranding your own website.

Tagged with:  
Glengarry Glenross

Always Be Closing

I’m sure there’s a punchline to answer the question posed above, but the serious answer is this: three.

  • One to get the ball rolling.
  • A second to introduce some internal competition and benchmarking.
  • A third in case the first two leave.

You don’t need lots of sales people at the start, but don’t leave yourself in the lurch either!

Tagged with:  

Some Predictions For 2011

A lot of the tech blogs I read play a game at the start of the year where their writers try to predict some of the new trends of the upcoming year. The fun part is when you get to look back a year (or two) later and see how right or wrong you were. Unfortunately I didn’t make any predictions last year, so I’m going to have to start from scratch, but here’s what myself and Caelen think are some of the likely trends in 2011.

  1. Mobile / Smart Phone Web Browsing Will Grow Rapidly
    On WhatClinic.com mobile or smart phones account for roughly 7% of our traffic. I expect this will grow significantly in the coming years, but for this year alone I’m going to say it will at least double.
  2. A New Public Enemy Number One
    There has always been an appetite in the media for a bad guy in the tech world. For years and years it was Microsoft, and recently both Facebook and Google have come under some pretty heavy scrutiny over privacy issues. Apple, currently valued at around $300 billion, is also a contender because of its sheer size, but which one will become the new Public Enemy Number One? It’ll be hard to prove this prediction one way or another but I think Facebook will cement itself in the media’s eyes as “the enemy” thanks to more Big Brother style privacy concerns. (Bigger gamblers would go for Foursquare / Gowalla / Twitter here…)
  3. Pay Walls Will Disappear In Favour Of Dedicated Apps
    People don’t want to pay per visit to read the news. To a lesser extent they also don’t want to get their credit cards out to take out a subscription. But app stores will have their payment details on file already from that time they bought Angry Birds. Expect all the big news media players to have dedicated apps with initially at least a variety of payment options (daily, once off, annual subscriptions and ad supported), and eventually drop the pay walls from their websites.
  4. Denial Of Service As Protest
    This one comes from Caelen, who predicts that D.O.S. attacks (which effectively disable the target website) will become more and more common, particularly as a form of protest against governments and large multinationals.
  5. A Flight Of The Healthy
    Private health insurance in Ireland is subject to a scheme called Risk Equalisation, which effectively means that the young and the healthy pay for the costs associated with the sick and elderly. As people tighten their belts, and the young in particular realise that they don’t really need health insurance until their thirties or forties, the sick and elderly will be left with rapidly increasing premiums and even a possible collapse of the private health insurance system as we know it.
  6. The Green Agenda Turns To Food Not Fuel
    This has been talked about for a long time, but as more green energy schemes come online and hybrid / electric cars become more popular, the focus of greening the planet will return to food related issues – what types of food you eat, where they come from and are the growing methods sustainable.
  7. Switching Off Part 1
    Instant on technologies will start to replace standby in laptops, TVs and other devices in order to save power when not in use. People will become more aware of the cost of using individual electrical items, e.g. your 40” LCD TV costs you €1 per hour to watch. People will get used to having to switch older appliances on and off at the wall more often once they start realising the cost of not doing so.
  8. Switching Off Part 2
    Expect to see some bars, restaurants, cinemas etc ask you to hand in your mobile phone before taking your seat. This will be part of a growing theme encouraging people to go offline more often and take part more in “meatspace” as one of my social media addict friends calls it, or the real world to you and me. Social media is great and all, but you don’t need to check Twitter every two minutes while you’re sat in a cafe with friends.
  9. Paid Video Content Becomes Global
    This one is probably too early, but sometime very soon the biggest blockbuster TV show won’t actually be on the TV first. The producers will deliver it globally through iTunes / YouTube or some other digital medium, so that each episode goes out at the same time globally. Enough people will pay for it (either through subscription or by watching / clicking on ads) because they want to watch it instantly on release and not wait even the few hours it’ll take for a torrent to appear.
  10. Social Media Games Get Serious
    I’m not talking about Farmville or the likes here, more about the game element of products like Foursquare. Right now the game element is pretty much just a high score boasting system. I have to say I don’t really see the point of it except for getting a few high score addicted early adopters to use the damn thing. But what if being the mayor of your local coffee shop came with a small wage attached? Or a check-in with a tweet or status update attached got you a 10% discount? Suddenly it’s not so pointless anymore.

So, there are some predictions for the coming year. Share yours in the comments below. Here are some of the blog posts that inspired this post:

Rand Fishkin on the SEOmoz blog
Matt Cutts on his predictions for 2009
JWT’s 100 things to watch in 2011
Damien Mulley’s ones to watch in 2011

Tagged with:  

A Look Back At 2010

The one question you’re guaranteed to be asked a hundred times or more over the holidays in Ireland is “How’s it going?” This is basically a catch all question giving you the opportunity to talk (or avoid talking) about your personal and professional lives with people that you see only a couple of times a year.

The question, coming as it does from people you don’t see that often, gives you a chance to reflect on perhaps a longer period of time than we’re normally used to considering. A lot of our communications, be they business based or personal, are very much of the moment.

So, if you haven’t been talking to us in WhatClinic.com for a little while, here’s how it’s going:

Traffic Growth

2010 started as any web company would want, with our best traffic figures ever, and as the months rolled on the visitors just kept on coming. We grew from 170K unique visitors in January to 450K unique visitors by July.

This strong traffic growth allowed us to cement our position in our existing markets and to open up some new ones too, particularly around S.E. Asia, growing our customer base in line with our traffic.

Rebranding

In August we changed our name from RevaHealth.com to WhatClinic.com, and it’s fair to say that things got a bit bumpy for a while, particularly in September and October. As our RevaHealth.com pages disappeared from the search engines, the WhatClinic.com versions of the pages weren’t taking their place the way we all expected them too.

This obviously had a serious knock on effect to our traffic, bringing it back to January levels for a short period of time. In the end it took anywhere from a few days to several months for the various pages of RevaHealth.com to reappear under the WhatClinic.com domain in the search engines, but happily we are out the other side now.

The rebranding of the site was a painful experience for us, but one that was necessary for the continued growth of the company, and we’re all looking forward to building the WhatClinic.com brand during 2011.

New Features

2010 also brought with it some major changes to the look and feel of the site along with new features for visitors and customers alike. Our telephone call tracking system in particular is helping customers contact potential patients they might otherwise have missed. It also gives our visitors low cost calls to international clinics.

Late in 2010 we also recognised the businesses that are working the hardest to make sure that our visitors have a positive experience when they contact a clinic by giving out our inaugural customer service awards. The response from both the clinics and our visitors has been overwhelmingly positive, so we will be continuing these awards in 2011.

In 2010 we brought 3.2 million unique visitors to WhatClinic.com. We put hundreds of thousands of patients in touch directly with clinics through email or by phone, passing on more than a billion dollars worth of potential business to our customers. In 2011, we’ll be doing much, much more.

Tagged with:  

Google Instant Preview and Analytics

Google’s Instant Preview, which lets you see a preview of the page you’re going to click through to, has been in testing for some time now and was finally rolled out to the world on November 9th. For those of you who haven’t seen it in action before, here’s Google’s own video demonstrating it.

I played around with Instant Preview a little over the last couple of days, and while it looks nice on the page I haven’t found it particularly useful yet. I’ve a feeling it will work well for certain types of search, obviously anything specifically visual related, maybe shopping for product you know already. The level of detail offered in the Instant Preview certainly isn’t sufficent to decide whether or not the content of a given page is useful, so it seems to be trying to promote “good looking” web pages.

Time will tell I guess, but what effect is Instant Preview having on your website right now? For us, you can see from the Analytics screenshot below that over the last couple of days, as more and more people hear about the product, there has been a small spike in what I thought was “weird us traffic”.

Traffic from Google Instant Preview

The traffic can be identified as having a source of (direct) and a medium of (none) in your own Analytics. It’s normal to expect a certain amount of this traffic from all over the globe that Analytics essentially can’t identify, but only our US (direct) (none) traffic has experienced this particular spike.

Normally a little extra traffic would be more than welcome, but in this case I think Google is doing something wrong. It seems like every person who uses Instant Preview is being counted as a visitor to our site, whether they click through or not. Judging from the 91.92% bounce rate of the traffic in question yesterday, this is not a good thing!

Bounce Rate for Google Instant Preview Traffic

The bounce rates above are only for this (direct) (none) traffic from the US, which wouldn’t be a problem if it were just the usual handful of visitors a day, not now that it’s heading towards several hundred with a bounce rate heading towards 100% it could start to have negative effect on the site overall. We work hard to keep our pages’ load times and bounce rates down, knowing that Google takes both into account when ranking pages.

Hopefully this is just an oversight on Google’s part which will be rectified soon, but in the meantime watch out for “weird us traffic” to your site with an abnormally high bounce rate. Let us know in the comments if you’ve experienced it too.

UPDATE 15 NOVEMBER

The UA we are seeing in our web server logs is 5.0+(en-us)+AppleWebKit/525.13+(KHTML,+like+Gecko;+Google+Web+Preview)+Version/3.1+Safari/525.13

UPDATE 23 NOVEMBER

It looks like Google have gotten around to fixing this problem now. We’ve seen the strange traffic fall off today on our Analytics, and Google have just posted this update to their Analytics blog: http://analytics.blogspot.com/2010/11/instant-preview-issue-resolved.html

14 Signs To Use A Door

Too many signs

I love travelling by train. I find it the least stressful way of travelling long distances and it often gives me the head space I need to think creatively. However, on a recent train journey I came across an brilliant example of design by committee that I wanted to share with you.

Most people know how to use doors.  In fact, even my one year old has figured out how to use them. So, for the most part, they shouldn’t need any explanatory notices. I would go so far as to say that door design is a solved problem. :)

However, designers sometimes make mistakes and when they do it is not uncommon for a note to be put up explaining how the door is operated. I’m sure we’ve all encountered a door that would have benefited from a “push” or a “pull” notice because the handle design didn’t make it obvious.

The toilet doors on this Irish Rail train however were totally ridiculous. They manage to use 14 signs, notices and labels to explain how to use their door!

  • On the outside of the toilet there are 2 diagrams on the open and close buttons, 2 separate notices  on fluorescent yellow stickers to explain these labels, and a sign to tell you if the toilet is occupied.
  • On the inside of the toilet there are 3 more diagrams on the open, close & lock buttons and 4 more separate notices in 3 different styles to explain these labels.
  • Then, as if that wasn’t enough, when you subsequently sit down on the toilet there is yet another notice straight in front of you reminding you that you might not have managed to lock the door.

Now all of this may seem a tad excessive, but not to Irish Rail because there is also a audible notice when you close and lock the door. So in total they use 14 signs, notices and labels to tell you how to use a door. I wonder how many people were involved in that decision, and did they ever even speak to each other?

What examples of signage gone mad have you come across?

Tagged with:  

Web Application Pricing Review – SEOMOZ

SEOMOZ is a collection of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) tools that automate a wide range of tasks. These include checking a site’s ranking for a selection of keywords, crawling a site for errors, and competitive intelligence. Compared to other SEO tools they have a killer marketing feature credibility.

Not only does the product ooze quality, it was also created by long standing and respected members of the SEO community. In our world, where SEO has become such as distrusted and misunderstood profession, the importance of credibility cannot be overstated.

[Disclosure: We use SEOMOZ at WhatClinic.com, but have no further relationships with the company.]

Test 1 – Simplicity

SEOMOZ Pricing

SEOMOZ Pricing

At first glance the pricing looks pretty overwhelming. There are three plans that each have different volume limits for each of four different feature sets, and to make matters worse each feature set has its own incremental scale, each of which is independent of the overall pricing scale:

SEOMOZ features scale

To a potential first time customer this makes the pricing seem complicated and confusing. To alleviate this SEOMOZ do an extremely good job of promoting the lowest price option and give reassurance that the first 30 day period is risk free.

Test 2 – Market Size

Pricing is definitely set high enough to make SEOMOZ commercially successful with any kind of reasonable market penetration.  If they have any kind of success getting customers onto higher price plans then I could see a tremendous amount of revenue being generated.

Normally I would think that a $99 per month entry was too high as it would exclude the bulk of the market. However, I feel that that this entry point is correct or near correct for SEOMOZ for two reasons.

  1. Price sensitive customers can rationalize a $99 expense by treating the purchase as a single $99 purchase which they then unsubscribe from. I see a slight potential problem here in that the 30 day money back guarantee essentially allows this market segment to game the system and get value for nothing.
  2. The market advantage SEOMOZ has is credibility, which would not be enhanced by low end pricing.

Test 3 – Comparable Pricing

Complete failure here. As a potential customer I have no idea if SEOMOZ is reasonably priced, there is simply no frame of reference. To make matters worse SEOMOZ price points are so distantly spaced that I can’t easily compare one price to another to determine the best one.  I would nearly always recommend having two price points relatively close to each other so that potential customers can directly and easily compare one to the other.

Test 4 – Adoption

The 30 day money back guarantee massively reduces the barrier to entry of the $99 per month price.  None-the-less I think I would prefer to see a massively crippled free version that I would use for lead generation.

For example I think a free plan that crawled just 25 pages and tracked 10 key phrases would be commercially useless but would still allow a potential customer who was wary of entering their credit card details to become comfortable with the product. In addition, amateurs would use it and talk about it which would increase overall market awareness.

Test 5 – Price Discrimination

SEOMOZ discriminate on volume not features. Essentially they’re saying “the more sites that you have & the bigger the sites the more you pay us”. This is a perfectly reasonable method of price discrimination, but I think that some feature discrimination could segment the market further and therefore improve revenues.

For example, I would suggest that the Q&A feature not be made available on the base plan.  This would then create strong pressure to upgrade during an SEO crisis period when the customer’s need of the product is at its highest and their price sensitivity is at its lowest.

SEOMOZ’s price discrimination is extremely aggressive. In fact I think it is far too aggressive. There is a massive difference between $100 a month and $500 a month. There have to be a large number of users on the $99 plan who would happily pay more, but won’t stretch to $500 per month.

Suggested New Pricing

Suggest new SEOMOZ pricing

The main point of this new pricing is the introduction of a new price point closer to the base plan. The base plan has also been reduced in functionality and number of campaigns. I believe that such a pricing structure wouldn’t hurt adoption while providing an attractive upgrade route for satisfied customers.

At this level of pricing I really don’t think that people are going to sign up for anything but the base plan so I think it’s okay that the PRO membership is still clearly the preferable option to start at.

SEOMOZ Pricing Analysis Score Card

Simplicity: 4
Market Size: 9
Comparable Pricing: 2
Adoption: 7
Price Discrimination: 3
   
SEOMOZ Score 5.0

 

Where Search Needs To Go

Google’s mission of “organizing the world’s information to make it universally accessible and useful” may seem like an impossible dream, but for me that dream doesn’t go far enough.

When I do a search I don’t just want information in return. At a minimum I want knowledge, and ideally I want the necessary understanding that goes with it too.

Social Search
Social Search (Image courtesy of Lone Wolf Librarian)

Even with the last decade’s worth of advances in search technology and online media, I still find by far the best way of understanding a topic is to discuss it with another knowledgeable person.

While the information available on the web is immensely valuable, it can take an inordinate amount of time to piece together all the relevant fragments (and to discard the irrelevant ones) in order to gain the knowledge that a real person would have about the subject.

What’s so frustrating is that often one of these knowledgeable people is in the same company or even the same room as you, but without standing up and asking everyone around you a question you have no way of knowing who that knowledgeable person is.

You don’t know who already knows what you want to know.

For example, imagine I am researching Photo Voltaic Cells for my house. Not only do I want to find out about all the available products and how they work, but I also want to know if one of my colleagues has experience with using them, or if one of my friends works in a related industry.

This is where I think Search needs to go. It needs to be able to tell me not just what information exists out there but also who I can talk to about it. Google have made some basic attempts to address this with beta features like “Results from people in your social circle for …” at the end of your search results, or by integrating live Twitter feeds relating to the keywords you use, but the results I’ve seen so far are patchy at best.

A well implemented feature that achieves this would not only save you lots of research time personally, it could also save businesses huge amounts of money by increasing productivity.

Imagine you work in a multinational and are tasked with looking into a piece of US tax legislation. You do a search and the results show that Mary in the Paris office did a lot of similar searches six months ago and created some documents that mention the topic too. A quick phone call to Mary could save you hours or even days getting an understanding of problem at hand.

Given all the recent media coverage about online privacy in relation to Facebook and the like there would definitely be some obstacles to overcome in relation to sharing the information needed to work out who knows what, but given the proliferation of Google Apps I think it would be well within their capabilities to start offering this in the enterprise space.

[A quick aside to the topic: Anyone who has ever done any teaching knows that sharing information is a beneficial in both directions. If you are knowledgeable about an area and teach it to someone else, often in the process you can develop an even greater understanding of the topic, particularly by being asked unexpected questions.]

The idea for this feature started out as part of a conversation I had with colleagues over a beer around two years ago and I’m a bit surprised that it hasn’t happened yet, but I have no doubt that it will, and soon. What ideas have you had to improve Search, and have any of them come to pass?

Tagged with:  
© 2010 WhatClinic.com Blog